45th Street bridge money should either require bike lanes or go to sidewalks and south end safety instead

Photo of the NE 45th Street Bridge.

A railing on this sidewalk will not make this bridge a safe and usable bike route. Note the desecrated sharrow representing how it feels to bike there.

Amid all the tough cuts to the proposed 2023-24 budget, including $4 million over two year from the sidewalk safety repair budget, one curious project is getting funding: A railing and some lighting on the NE 45th Street bridge over I-5.

Don’t get me wrong, the NE 45th Street overpass desperately needs safety improvements. I should know since I live less than two blocks away and bike or walk across this bridge daily. I personally appreciate that Councilmember Alex Pedersen has been pushing for investments to improve this bridge. But the project has developed all wrong and needs a total reset before getting a dime for construction. Worse, the specific “improvements” cited in the budget text would do next to nothing to address the real safety and mobility issues on the bridge while also potentially limiting future redesign options.

The budget action would use $1.5 million in funds raised by a $10 increase to Seattle’s vehicle license fee to build “pedestrian and bicycle safety improvements on the NE 45th St structure crossing Interstate 5 including, but not limited to, interior and external fencing of pedestrian and bicycle crossing space, and lighting improvements,” according to the November 14 draft of the initial balancing package (PDF page 120). What they are calling a “pedestrian and bicycle crossing space” is actually just a sidewalk that is in no way set up for bicycling. People do bike there, but only because biking in the roadway can be extremely stressful. The sidewalk is not wide enough to serve as a multi-use trail, and adding a railing would potentially reduce this space even further. But worse, there is no usable connection on either end of the bridge for someone try to bike between Wallingford and the U District.

The process that led to this point was frustrating because WSDOT said no to the kinds of changes that are actually needed to make this a safe and usable bike connection. The project needs a total reset, and this time we need WSDOT to be a genuine partner in safety with the community and with SDOT. We need to start all over and put bike lanes and neighborhood connections back on the priority list.

This is where my concerns with the railings come in. It is possible designing safe and protected bike lanes on the bridge would require modifying the existing curbline to create space for both a sidewalk and protected bike lanes. The presence of a railing would likely constrain these options. Here’s an example I found in my Streetmix drafts from back in early 2021:

Cross-section diagram of the bridge with sidewalks and bike lanes on both sides of the street as well as bus lanes.I’m not saying this is the version they need to build, but my point is that the existing curb would have to be modified to make this or many other options work.

If the City Council moves forward with this funding, they should consider rewording it to remove a railing from the requirements and add a proviso that the project must include protected bike lanes in both directions. Otherwise, as much as it truly sucks to say it as a user of this terrible bridge, the money should go to more deserving investments.

About Tom Fucoloro

Founder and Editor of Seattle Bike Blog.
This entry was posted in news and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to 45th Street bridge money should either require bike lanes or go to sidewalks and south end safety instead

  1. Eric Fisk says:

    The fencing will go on the outside of the existing railing, like every overpass in Portland has. We believe it is going to be based on the fencing on the Aurora bridge. The benefit is for everyone- stuff won’t get thrown on the freeway below, cyclists won’t need to worry about falling over when using the sidewalk, and people with kids / the elderly can walk across the bridge with less worry. Oregon has put fencing on every overpass in their state, and we are hoping this crossing can be a start point for a similar project in Washington State. Visit Portland to see what a huge difference the fencing there makes to the experience of using overpasses.

    There is also a big meeting with SDOT leadership this coming Monday. They have been assessing the uphill bike lane across the bridge (see https://www.udistrictmobility.com/safe-crossing.html). Jim Curtin is due to report back on findings. The project has been fully funded twice, but each time SDOT has killed the project, so we need SDOT approval before we even begin to line up funding a third time.

  2. asdf2 says:

    What’s really needed, but will never happen, is a separate bike/ped bridge at 47th. Avoid the car sewer of 45th completely.

    • Liora says:

      The bike bridge should be from 44th in Wallingford (already a neighborhood greenway) to 43rd in the u district for direct access to the light rail. Why end imagine it on 47th where it doesn’t connect to anything?

      • Skylar says:

        I do think the placement of bike lanes on the proposed 45th bridge are a mistake, unless the bike infrastructure is built up on either side so it’s not an island. I’m not a fan of the 47th option since there’s a big hill to go up on the Wallingford side.

        Another option if a connection at 44th isn’t viable would be to use the substantial empty space underneath the north end of the I-5 bridge to build a real trail. Currently it’s a dirt path with a substantial encampment and some underutilized fenced-in WSDOT storage, but could be a connection on NE 42nd St. In order to make that truly useful it would be necessary to continue the Wallingford greenway from 44th to 42nd (with all the attendant traffic control), in addition to connections in the U-District to 43rd.

Leave a Reply