SDOT Proposes Using Bike Budget to Make Stay Healthy Streets Permanent

Heavy duty street closed barricade on a Stay Healthy street

New barricade on the Central District’s Stay Healthy Street

The Seattle Department of Transportation generated national headlines back in May with an announcement that it would be taking steps to make twenty miles of “Stay Healthy Streets” permanent. This big announcement that a chunk of Seattle’s neighborhood greenway network would get upgrades that make them more enjoyable and safer to use was cheered by many, and for good reason.
Seattle’s neighborhood greenway network has suffered from inconsistent standards, with little physical infrastructure that prevents people driving cars from utilizing them as an arterial alternative, and little accompanying pedestrian improvements.

But when that announcement was made earlier this year, we didn’t have a great idea of what those permanent improvements might look like, or what city funding would be used to make them. Last week, a city oversight committee was asked to approve a funding source for permanent Stay Healthy Streets: the existing bike budget.

A memo written by Jim Curtin, SDOT’s Project Development Division Director, asks the Move Seattle levy’s oversight committee to approve use of levy dollars for the upgrade of Stay Healthy Street using “durable materials”. It states that these upgrades will “improve safety on Stay Healthy Streets and support a community driven process that was not possible during the initial COVID-19 emergency response”, citing a 357% increase in people walking and a 111% increase in people biking along the Stay Healthy Streets since they were implemented. (According to the same memo, regular neighborhood greenways only saw a 37% increase in people biking compared to a normal neighborhood street.)

In return, more than two and a half miles of new neighborhood greenway projects would lose construction funding. This would further reduce the amount of bike facilities installed over the life of the 9-year Move Seattle transportation levy. A recent report to the oversight committee listed fewer than 35 miles of either protected bike lanes or neighborhood greenways completed to date compared with the 110 miles that were promised to voters in 2015. The bike master plan program is expected to fall well short of its goal already.

The projects that would be defunded to pay for Stay Healthy Streets were listed in the memo:

  • Thomas Street in South Lake Union. This connection would create a safe route between Seattle Center and the north-south routes of Dexter, 9th Ave N, and the south end of Eastlake. These improvements to Thomas are distinguished from some of the public space improvements that are coming in the Thomas Street Redefined project, it’s not exactly clear yet what wouldn’t be able to be accomplished if this funding was moved.
  • The Central Ridge greenway‘s second phase. This neighborhood greenway will run mostly along 18th Ave between Capitol Hill and the Central District, with the first phase under construction now. The second phase includes everything north of Columbia Street, and reallocating project funding would mean everything would go on hold except for the crossing improvements at both Madison and Union Streets, funded by other projects.
  • A safe connection to Lincoln High School. This greenway connection, planned for 2022 in last year’s bike master plan update, would have bridged N 45th Street between north and south Wallingford. The memo recommends it be “re-evaluated” to receive Safe Routes to Schools funding at a later date.

Money would still be spent getting these projects “shovel ready” by funding them through the design phase, to perhaps be funded by council earmark or through the next transportation levy beyond 2024.

In order for this funding swap to occur, the levy oversight committee will need to sign off. There was no clear consensus at the meeting about doing so, with the representative for the Bicycle Advisory Board, Patrick Taylor, being pretty clear that he wanted the bike board’s opinion on the issue to be taken into consideration, and noting that they hadn’t been directly asked about the change. In January, the bike board will be holding a joint meeting with the Pedestrian Advisory Board and is expected to discuss the proposal then.

It may be hard to convince the oversight board to sign off on the proposal without a clear picture of what exactly the hardening of the Stay Healthy Street network will look like. But that will likely not be fully known until SDOT conducts the outreach that it wasn’t able to do in the lead-up to the initial roll out of the program.

Others might suggest SDOT find the money to fulfill its promise elsewhere: Gordon Padelford, executive director of Seattle Neighborhood Greenways tweeted: “Here’s a better way to fund [Stay Healthy Streets] next year: SDOT should charge SPD delivery costs and big rental fees for the eco blocks being used to armor police property”, referring to the walls constructed at both the west and east police precincts this summer. “Why? Those blocks were originally intended to upgrade and expand Stay Healthy Streets, and belong to SDOT”.

SDOT is still upgrading the current Stay Healthy Street network. After months of the barriers and signs along the Stay Healthy routes getting moved and run over by drivers, SDOT is slowly replacing the A-frame signage along the network with more durable, but still temporary, materials that are secured to the street. These include full Street Closed barricades at major intersections (as seen in the top photo) and smaller traffic barrels at minor ones. The funding for these improvements comes from the city’s COVID-19 response budget.

Diagram showing 'street closed' traffic barrel

SDOT’s next phase of Stay Healthy Street barrier

SDOT also noted in its memo to the oversight committee that any new neighborhood greenways that are installed in the future will also have an opportunity to become a Stay Healthy Street, which begs the question: is it really a neighborhood greenway if it’s not a Stay Healthy Street? The bar has simply been raised to a new minimum standard for neighborhood greenways that are safe for people to walk, bike, and roll on. But there is the small caveat that without the “street closed” sign on the block, it’s not technically legal to walk in the roadway. But the state legislature should take another look at that antiquated law that helps no one.

Next year it will be more clear exactly how the Stay Healthy Streets program will evolve, and where the funding will come from. What is clear it that there’s more momentum than ever for robust traffic calming on Seattle’s greenway network, which is a great thing to see. Turning that momentum into permanent improvements should definitely happen, but ideally not at the expense of other city goals.

About Ryan Packer

Ryan Packer is Temporary Editor of Seattle Bike Blog.
This entry was posted in news. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to SDOT Proposes Using Bike Budget to Make Stay Healthy Streets Permanent

  1. JB says:

    Sounds like another cynical Durkanesque bait and switch. Good luck maintaining those streets at any kind of bicycle or pedestrian priority once traffic returns to pre-pandemic levels.

    • Peri Hartman says:

      In my opinion, the only way to have long term, safe pedestrian streets is to splatter them with dead-ends – block the streets in strategic locations so that they cannot be used as a cut through but still allows local visits and deliveries. The barriers would still allow cyclists and peds to easily pass through. This has been discussed by Padelford at Seattle Neighborhood Greenways.

      • dave says:

        I totally agree. Dead-ends and/or diagonal diverters like the ones that exist in Capitol Hill (e.g., 17th/Republican).

  2. Peri Hartman says:

    I think we should encourage the funds to stay allocated towards biking improvements and maintenance.

    Two reasons:

    1. There’s no urgency for safe street and we don’t really know how they will be used once the pandemic is over.

    2. There are too many needed bike projects, especially in the minority neighborhoods.

    Let’s keep the ball rolling on bike improvements.

    • Bruce Nourish says:

      +1. We’ve spent years hashing out a set of streets that should get bike/ped-oriented improvements. It’s not at all clear to me why we should throw all those plans in the bin and move this ad hoc set of Stay Healthy Streets to the top of the line.

  3. Richard Cook says:

    Easy. Ban all cars from Seattle streets. And trucks(that bring your groceries,etc.,etc.) and first responders,etc.,etc.,and so on. Then you’ll have your little bike utopia. But probably won’t live long enough to enjoy it. Cheers and have a great day!

    • JB says:

      Easy. Ban all people walking and biking from Seattle streets. We can have a little car utopia where everybody drives everywhere for every single trip, and there will always be easy parking and plenty of road space. Nobody ever gets hurt in car accidents, and it’s not like we need to worry about little details like the air we breathe and global climate change.

  4. Robin Briggs says:

    How about lowering the speed limit on non-arterials (10 mph maybe) and making it legal to use them for other things (walking, ball games) as long as those activities can move over when a car comes by. That’s a solution that would require no money, and you wouldn’t have to establish more greenways either. Drivers are disincentivized to cut through neighborhoods, especially if there are hefty fines. Would the state have to change the law to make that possible?

    • RossB says:

      Too much work. The best solution is the one Peri Hartman wrote about up above. Close off the streets. As Dave wrote, you need dead-ends and/or diagonal diverters like the ones that exist in Capitol Hill (e.g., 17th/Republican). It benefits locals immensely. Yeah, some folks have to drive out of their way to get anywhere, but there is great value in living on a dead end street. Except this is the best of both worlds — you have a quiet street, where no one drives through, but you can walk to the nearest grocery store, restaurant, bus stop. Way cheaper than hiring cops to enforce sensible speed limits.

  5. Ott Toomet says:

    Who are the target group of stay healthy streets? Do they gain from those?

    For me the main issue with those streets (and greenways too) is that they tend not to connect to the destinations. Now in the COVID-time it is largely groceries and my favorite jogging loops, earlier it was also the workplace. So I’d like to see this money spent on connecting existing nice-to-be streets, whatever they are called, with the important destinations, and bridging the existing gaps (I5 crossing and several bridges are the places where I’d like to see improvement). But maybe the current design is better to take a walk with small kids in a neighborhood?

Leave a Reply