Path Less Pedaled: Iron Horse Trail is ‘great resource’ that deserves more attention

From a state pamphlet (click for full pdf)

From a state pamphlet (click for full pdf)

Russ and Laura, the renown bicycle tourism promoters behind The Path Less Pedaled, recently joined Jason from Swift Industries for a “bikefishing” trip down the Iron Horse Trail, officially known as the John Wayne Pioneer Trail.

We wrote recently about new state efforts to open even more tunnels along the trail route. But even as it is, Russ and Laura say the trail is a “great resource” both for camping and day trips.

They recently posted about their trip, and I encourage you to read the whole thing. But the takeaway for them was that the trail could be quite an attraction, helping the small economies surrounding it. They were surprised this was not marketed more.

From the Path Less Pedaled:

We rode only a portion of the Iron Horse Trail and really enjoyed it and look forward to exploring it more in the future. The section we rode was pretty tame riding (perfect for families or a S24O) but we hear it gets rougher the further east you go (downed bridges, crossing a military base, signing waivers to ride through tunnels, etc.,). But we’ll save that part for a future adventure.

One thought that really stood out in our mind is how great a resource is the Iron Horse Trail. Our return trip was on a Saturday and we saw lots of day riders and climbers using the trail. Despite that, we felt that it could be even MORE popular. Being just a visitor and not privy to the politics of the trail, I was surprised at the lack of marketing behind the Iron Horse. It really could be an awesome bike destination, if only people knew about it and if the local communities seemed more connected to it. In the end, the riding was great, the fishing could have been better, but it was still a fine way to celebrate the 4th of July.

This entry was posted in news and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to Path Less Pedaled: Iron Horse Trail is ‘great resource’ that deserves more attention

  1. Zach Shaner says:

    I love the trail, and I keep a pair of knobby-ish tires around just for riding between Rattlesnake Lake and the Snoqualmie Pass tunnel. The 1-2% grade is easy for anyone, and it’s incredible to bike up to 3000′ and back with only moderate effort. The trail is truly a treasure, but it’s a treasure-by-default since it’s really just the torn-up Milwaukee Road repurposed for nonmotorized travel. We haven’t really put any effort into marketing or improving it.

    But just imagine the possibilities of fully paved, grade-separated, gentle trails linking Downtown Seattle to Snoqualmie Pass (or Easton? Vantage?)? People would come in droves to bike that, and it might just make us the best bike tourism spot in the country. We already have an impressive patchwork, we just need to connect the dots: pave the East Lake Sammamish Trail, pave the the Issaquah-Preston trail, rebuild the connection between the Preston-Snoqualmie trail and Snoqualmie Falls, pave the connection between North Bend and Rattlesnake Lake, and pave the rest of the grade up to and through the main tunnel. Charge $10 use fees east of North Bend, and you’ll make your capital costs back within a decade. Sigh, dreaming.

  2. Doug Bostrom says:

    I don’t know about all that pavement. Peaceful riding today might end up as hair-raising encounters with roadies screaming “hold your line” and generally taking everything a little too seriously. Sometimes grit and gravel are all that stand between us and the law of the jungle. :-)

    • Gary says:

      I agree, too much pave and it does get “roadied” out, on the other hand there isn’t a good way to ride a road bicycle from Seattle to the Eastern side of the mountains.

      As for connections, if the bit from Landsburg to Rattlesnake was opened up, it is already owned by the county but it’s in the Seattle watershed, that would be another great connection as well.

      As for riding gravel, I’ve got a wide tired bicycle for it, and so do my kids. The Maple Valley to Landsburg part of the Cedar trail isn’t paved and it’s slightly uphill and a great ride.

      • Tom Fucoloro says:

        If I’m not mistaken, I think the John Wayne Trail (or at least part of it) is also a horseback riding trail, which may be another reason for not paving it. Is this true?

      • Zach Shaner says:

        Yes, there are signs saying that bikes should yield to peds and equestrians. In my opinion the ROW is wide enough to accommodate a paved trail adjacent to a soft surface equestrian path.

        I understand the complaints about pretentious roadies taking over, but I’d rather police that behavior somehow (speed limits, writing tickets, whatever) while greatly increasing the corridor’s bikeability rather than keep it gravel and have most people never know about it. Seriously, a paved BGT-SRT-E Lake Sammamish-Issaquah-Snoqualmie Pass route would be top of the world in terms of an easy, accessible introduction to bike touring.

      • Lynne says:

        Speed limits, yeah. Because they are enforced on the Burke.

      • Al Dimond says:

        I dunno ’bout y’all, but I’ve never heard anyone yell “hold your line” on the Burke. I really don’t have anything against small fast groups riding in lines on much of the Burke as long as they observe basic courtesy, and most do (part of basic courtesy is slowing down when there are other people around).

        The best way to keep cycling behavior honest is to have lots of normal people around, right? And unpaved trails hardly are a guarantee of that — some of the most dangerous over-fast riding occurs on MTB trails.

      • Dan says:

        Does any one knows the Pole Line Rd adjacent to Landsburg open to public? I was attempted to get to the Snoqualmie Pass Tunnel from Cedar River Trail but was stopped at Landsburg. I want to give it another try if Pole Line Rd is open to ride bicycle.

  3. Pingback: HorsesAss.Org » Blog Archive » Free Fun

  4. Erik Olson says:

    Having the come of the country’s best drinking water vs. filling in a missing link from Cedar River to Iron Horse trail… which to choose? Maybe if the Preston-Snoqualmie trail were completed into North Bend instead?

    • Gary says:

      Drinking water vs Bicycle trail:
      It would be possible to transit the watershed without having ruin the drinking water. This was the same excuse they used for years to keep fish out of the upper reaches of the Cedar river. Besides, things like the giardia parasite don’t come from people, as in the water has to be treated anyway.

      But because we don’t want folks wandering around the watershed, it would have to be fenced as well, adding to the cost.

  5. Double D says:

    PAVEMENT? I hope you’re all joking. The JWPT is one of the last refuges to get away from the norm and enjoy a little “Vitamin G.” Pavement would ruin the experience for everyone. Buy some bigger tires if you must (FWIW – I’ve ridden from Cle Elum to Seattle via the JWPT on a road bike with 28s and had no problems), but pavement/asphalt, in my opinion, would be awful and would essentially turn the Iron Horse into the Burke-Gilman. Keep things wild.

  6. Double D says:

    And Tom, to answer your question, the IHT is a multi-use trail and the further east you get, the more equestrians you’ll find using it, especially near Ellensburg. It gets rough out there because of the extra use and lack of upkeep, but it’s still a treasure to have.

  7. Pingback: Biking Bis: All John Wayne Trail tunnels are now open | Seattle Bike Blog

  8. Pingback: Seattle Kidical Mass bike camping 2013 | Family Ride

  9. dana berg says:

    Bainbridge Island is trying to complete a trail called the Sound to Olympics Trail which would connect the west side of Puget Sound to Seattle and this long distance state trail. And it would include a beautiful ferry ride…where bikes are free.

Add Comment Register

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>