Madison BRT project could also build better Union St bike lanes

Image from SDOT (12th/Union/Madison)

Image from SDOT (12th/Union/Madison)

MadisonBRT_OpenHouse3_Presentation_05062015-map copyUnion Street could get a major bike lane update as part of the Madison Bus Rapid Transit project, according to city plans presented at an open house earlier this week.

The bike route upgrades are part of an attempt to make the Madison Street BRT project a “complete street” by building a nearby “parallel” bike facility rather than trying to squeeze a bike lane onto Madison itself. I’m going to focus on the bike elements here, but you can learn more about the transit elements of the plan in this story from Capitol Hill Seattle.

The first thing you will notice when looking at the bike route map is that it sure stretches the definition of the word “parallel.” Madison is a diagonal street in the grid, so there is no truly parallel route, which planners admit in their outreach materials:

The Madison BRT study includes the identification of a “parallel” bikeway facility. As a diagonal street in a grid network, it is not possible to develop a precise parallel route to Madison for bicyclists. However, with a suite of targeted bikeway investments and intersection enhancements, improved bicycle access to existing destinations and the future bus rapid transit service on Madison Street is possible. The goal of this bikeway is to improve bicycle access for people of all ages and abilities.

At 23rd and Union, the planned bike lane is almost half a mile from Madison. At 27th and Union, the bike route is 0.7 miles from Madison. We argued previously that if a so-called “parallel” bike route is actually preferable to bike lanes on a diagonal street, there need to be quality routes on both sides of the street. Because Union Street doesn’t serve someone near Miller Park, for example. Investing in a Denny Way neighborhood greenway could be a way to help provide a route north of Madison.

But investing in a better bike lane on Union would be huge for bikeability in the Central District and Capitol Hill. And the BRT plans seem to be taking crossing improvements seriously. For example, here’s a concept for how to fix the crazy, stressful and dangerous intersection at 12th/Union/Madison:

MadisonBRT_FINAL Boards_WEB-12-union-map12th Ave is also a major bike route, and a safety redesign that takes these bike route connections seriously would be huge for bike access and comfort in the area. It’s not gonna be easy, though. How do people biking on 12th make left turns onto Union? How do people biking continue straight through on Union? How do we speed up Metro’s Route 2 bus? A design that can serve all these needs would be huge for the neighborhood and for cross-city biking and transit routes.

But right now, this is “a challenging intersection to navigate for all users – transit riders, pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers,” according to outreach materials. That’s putting it mildly.

The big question for the rest of the Union bike lanes is whether a two-way bikeway or two one-way bike lanes are preferred. Here’s what the potential options could look like:

MadisonBRT_OpenHouse3_Presentation_05062015-one-wayMadisonBRT_OpenHouse3_Presentation_05062015-two-wayThe hilly terrain on Union will be challenging for either option, especially for turning conflicts at unsignalized intersections and driveways. This is a challenge the city needs to figure out for projects all across the city, as highlighted recently at 42nd and Roosevelt.

But today, the outdated paint-only bike lanes (where they exist) are often located in the door zone of parked cars. It’s a major bike route that would be used a whole lot more if it were safer and more comfortable (I know because I live there!).

If a two-way bikeway were chosen, here’s how the 23rd and Union area could look:

MadisonBRT_FINAL Boards_WEB-23rdThere are also some serious walking safety needs on this stretch of Union. I recently attended a meeting of Positively Union, a new group convened by commercial property owner and longtime community leader Jean Tinnea. Tinnea was seriously injured a year ago when someone driving failed to stop for her at the crosswalk at 20th and Union. Now she’s back on her feet and determined to make the street safer.

The group brought up ideas like installing raised crosswalks to slow people driving (and biking) on the fast downhill stretches. One longtime member of Good Shepherd Lutheran Church (where the meeting was held) spoke about how scared she is to cross the street near her Madrona home ever since she was hit years ago. She has never owned a car, and her story really hit home how long overdue these safety changes are.

First Hill and downtown

Marion Street not shown, but it's one block south of Madison

Marion Street on First Hill not shown, but it’s one block south of Madison

On the other end of the project area, protected bike lanes on Seneca and Spring would also provide a much-needed connection between First Hill and downtown. Currently, all options are either too steep, poorly designed for bikes or both.

Those bike lanes would then connect via 9th Ave to a great neighborhood greenway opportunity on University Street.

But, of course, University Street is not all that close to Madison and does nothing for needs south of Madison. It would be great to see the rest of 9th Ave get improvements (it’s a great connection to Harborview, Jefferson Street and the Yesler Terrace neighborhood) as well as a connection to a potential neighborhood greenway on Marion Street, which would help serve more neighborhood needs around Madison and connect to Broadway and Seattle U.

The city is already planning a neighborhood greenway on Columbia Street, which would meet up nicely with a Marion route (there’s an open house on that project 6:15 p.m. May 12 at Douglass-Truth Library).

The Madison BRT project timeline is to draft a preferred deign option in June and finalize it in the fall after more public outreach. From there, the timeline depends on whether voters approve the Move Seattle levy in November. If so, project development would happen in 2016 and 2017 for construction in 2018.

If you have comments on the plans, send them to Maria Koengeter, Transit Strategic Advisor, at MadisonBRT@seattle.gov or (206) 733-9865. And, of course, post your thoughts below.

This entry was posted in news and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Madison BRT project could also build better Union St bike lanes

  1. Josh says:

    Much too hilly for a two-way path with 5-foot lanes to be safe. Bikes can easily top 20 mph coasting on those slopes, meaning faster riders will be passing slower riders, and even the slower riders will be going fast enough that those riding against traffic will be at risk at every intersection, crosswalk, and driveway.

    European experience with bidirectional sidepaths is clear:

    Bi-directional cycle tracks along roads invariably lead to non-conventional manoeuvres at junctions and where such tracks terminate. These situations entail a significant risk of crashes. Two-directional cycle tracks along roads generally should be avoided, unless the advantages are very clear or the space constraints for two unidirectional tracks insurmountable.

    http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/transport/cycling-health-and-safety_9789282105955-en#page179

    • ODB says:

      Absolutely agree. The proposed two-way lane presents very troubling safety issues for cyclists, balanced the advantage to cars of preserving parking on two sides of the street rather than one. From a bicycling perspective, the two-way lane would be much worse than the status quo–and this is a route I use with some frequency.

      In fact, in my opinion, the design for the one-way lanes would also be worse than the status quo because it has one side lurking behind parked cars. If the planners feel this is absolutely necessary to enhance the sense of comfort for some riders, at least this behind-parked-cars treatment should be on the uphill portions only, so that downhill riders don’t emerge at speed from their hiding place behind the cars.

  2. ChuDlife says:

    The one way bike lanes would be a huge improvement over the existing lanes but the buffer will need to be more than paint. Currently the paint-only lanes get used by drivers for passing cars turning left or stopped for pedestrians. I have had several close calls with the bike lane snake around while crossing Union.

  3. Joseph says:

    I agree with Josh. Two-way bike lanes are dangerous and should be avoided. Let’s hope they do.

  4. Josh says:

    Looking more at that “23rd and Union area” design, I’m sure I’m not the only person who would choose to bike in the travel lanes instead of that narrow, hazardous sidepath.

    Unfortunately, as experience elsewhere in the city has shown, motorists get even crankier when they see people riding in the street instead of using bike paths that look perfectly safe from the seat of a car. Many drivers mistakenly believe bicyclists are supposed to or even required to ride in bike lanes. A dangerous minority of drivers will attempt to “teach a lesson” to cyclists who choose the street for whatever reason.

    If the bidirectional path is chosen, I believe the travel lanes should also have shared lane markings and “Bike May Use Full Lane” signs.

  5. RossB says:

    It has been a while since I’ve walked around those neighborhoods (and I don’t think I ever tried to bike it) so I pulled up a topographic map to look at things from that perspective. Correct me if I’m wrong on this, but a couple things stood out:

    First, the zig zag is better than just going straight on Madison, assuming you want to get to the other side. You basically skirt part of the hill. You could skirt more of it by zig-zagging south starting earlier, but this works fairly well.

    Second, I’m not thrilled with 27th. As you start getting close to Madison, it gets a lot steeper there. I would think a better choice would be 24th. If I’m headed in that general direction (Madison between 23rd and MLK) then I would cut over on 24th (I would leave Union at 24th). Of course, the big challenge there is crossing Madison on 24th. But if that could be worked out, I think that would be better. Except for this crossing, I think 24th makes a wonderful north/south bike street (from Holy Names to well past Garfield it is pretty flat).

    25th might be a good compromise. This is still less steep than 27th, and all you would need to do is add a light on the crossing.

  6. Pingback: What We’re Reading: Parks or Housing? | The Urbanist

  7. JB says:

    These bike lane drawings look ok on a flat sheet of paper but when you know about the slope of Union Street it is a different story. A bicycle is a very different vehicle going downhill at 25 mph than it is going uphill at 5 mph, and these designs should really do better about acknowledging the effect of the hill. A 10 foot lane is probably a safer and more realistic width for a bicycle traveling at speed.

  8. Pingback: The Times is wrong. A megaproject won’t fix our traffic, we need Move Seattle | Seattle Bike Blog

  9. Pingback: What a “no” vote on Move Seattle actually means | Seattle Bike Blog

  10. Pingback: Help keep Madison BRT and bike route designs bold at Monday open house | Seattle Bike Blog

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *